On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 07:53:21AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On 11.09.2019 11:24, Eugen Hristev - M18282 wrote: > > From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hello, > > > > This series adds support for analog and digital filters for i2c controllers > > > > This series is based on the series: > > [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: at91: filters support for at91 SoCs > > and later > > [PATCH v4 0/9] i2c: add support for filters > > and enhanced to add the bindings for all controllers plus an extra bindings > > for the width of the spikes in nanoseconds (digital filters) and cut-off > > frequency (analog filters) > > > > First, bindings are created for > > 'i2c-analog-filter' > > 'i2c-digital-filter' > > 'i2c-digital-filter-width-ns' > > 'i2c-analog-filter-cutoff-frequency' > > > > The support is added in the i2c core to retrieve filter width/cutoff frequency > > and add it to the timings structure. > > Next, the at91 driver is enhanced for supporting digital filter, advanced > > digital filter (with selectable spike width) and the analog filter. > > > > Finally the device tree for two boards are modified to make use of the > > new properties. > > > > This series is the result of the comments on the ML in the direction > > requested: to make the bindings globally available for i2c drivers. > > > > Changes in v5: > > - renamed i2c-filter-width-ns to i2c-digital-filter-width-ns as this > > is applicable only to digital filter > > - created new binding i2c-digital-filter-width-ns for analog filters. > > Hello Wolfram and Peter, > > Are you happy with the changes in this version? I haven't heard from you > since this latest update. > I am interested to know if anymore changes are required or maybe we can > move further with this support. So, I had a look now and I am happy. I will give Peter one more day to comment, otherwise I'll apply it tomorrow. Thanks for your patience and keeping at it!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
