On 18-10-19, 15:39, Taniya Das wrote:
> Add support for clock RPMh driver to vote for ARC and VRM managed
> clock resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index 96a36f6..7301c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -391,6 +391,24 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8150 = {
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8150_rpmh_clocks),
> };
>
> +static struct clk_hw *sc7180_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> + [RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &sdm845_bi_tcxo.hw,
> + [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A] = &sdm845_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk2.hw,
> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk2_ao.hw,
> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk3.hw,
> + [RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw,
> + [RPMH_RF_CLK1] = &sdm845_rf_clk1.hw,
> + [RPMH_RF_CLK1_A] = &sdm845_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> + [RPMH_RF_CLK2] = &sdm845_rf_clk2.hw,
> + [RPMH_RF_CLK2_A] = &sdm845_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sc7180 = {
> + .clks = sc7180_rpmh_clocks,
> + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_rpmh_clocks),
> +};
> +
> static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
> void *data)
> {
> @@ -471,6 +489,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845},
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7180},
Is the table above not same as sm8150, if so cant we reuse that for
sc7180?
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
> --
> Qualcomm INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.is a member
> of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
~Vinod
