On 2019-10-21 07:55, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add sc7180 pdc irqchip
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: No change
drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
index faa7d61b9d6c..954fb599fa9c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
@@ -310,3 +310,4 @@ static int qcom_pdc_init(struct device_node
*node, struct device_node *parent)
}
IRQCHIP_DECLARE(pdc_sdm845, "qcom,sdm845-pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(pdc_sc7180, "qcom,sc7180-pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
What I gather from these 3 irq-related patches is that as far as
the PDC is concerned, SDM845/850 and SC7180 are strictly identical.
Why the churn?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
