On 16/10/19 12:12 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:59:14PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Add device tree bindings for PCI endpoint function device. The >> nodes for PCI endpoint function device should be attached to >> PCI endpoint function bus. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/pci/endpoint/pci-epf.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/endpoint/pci-epf.txt > > This and the previous patch for the bus should be combined and please > convert to a schema. Sure Rob. Thanks for the review. -Kishon > >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/endpoint/pci-epf.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/endpoint/pci-epf.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..f006395fd526 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/endpoint/pci-epf.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ >> +PCI Endpoint Function Device >> + >> +This describes the generic bindings to be used when a device has to be >> +exposed to the remote host over PCIe. The device could be an actual >> +peripheral in the platform or a virtual device created by the software. >> + >> +epcs : phandle to the endpoint controller device >> +epc-names : the names of the endpoint controller device corresponding >> + to the EPCs present in the *epcs* phandle > > Other than the NTB case, I'd expect the parent device to be the > controller. Let's make NTB the exception... > > >> +vendor-id: used to identify device manufacturer >> +device-id: used to identify a particular device >> +baseclass-code: used to classify the type of function the device performs >> +subclass-code: used to identify more specifically the function of the device > > Are these codes standard? > > Powerpc has "class-code" already... > >> +subsys-vendor-id: used to identify vendor of the add-in card or subsystem > > Powerpc has "subsystem-vendor-id" already... > >> +subsys-id: used to specify an id that is specific to a vendor >> + >> +Example: >> +Following is an example of NTB device exposed to the remote host. >> + >> +ntb { > > This is going to need some sort of addressing (which implies 'reg')? If > not, I don't understand why you have 2 levels. > >> + compatible = "pci-epf-ntb"; >> + epcs = <&pcie0_ep>, <&pcie1_ep>; >> + epc-names = "primary", "secondary"; >> + vendor-id = /bits/ 16 <0x104c>; >> + device-id = /bits/ 16 <0xb00d>; > > These have a long history in OF and should be 32-bits (yes, we've let > some cases of 16-bit creep in). > >> + num-mws = <4>; > > Doesn't this apply to more than NTB? > > Can't you just get the length of 'mws-size'? > >> + mws-size = <0x100000>, <0x100000>, <0x100000>, <0x100000>; > > Need to support 64-bit sizes? > >> +}; >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>