On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:49:08PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > The MIPI DSI controller in Allwinner A64 is similar to A33. > > > > But unlike A33, A64 doesn't have DSI_SCLK gating so it is valid > > to with separate compatible for A64 on the same driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > index dafc0980c4fa..cfcc84d38084 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml > > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ properties: > > "#size-cells": true > > > > compatible: > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > > + enum: > > + - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi > > How did you test this? It will report an error when running the > validation I did follow the v9 comments [1] and forgot to do dt-doc-validate. will send the v11 for this patch alone, will that be okay? [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/307499/
