Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: fix master pending state handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2019 4:11 PM, Tao Ren wrote:
On 10/10/19 3:04 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
On 10/10/2019 2:20 PM, Tao Ren wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:20 PM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
[...]
           /*
            * If a peer master starts a xfer immediately after it queues a
-         * master command, change its state to 'pending' then H/W will
-         * continue the queued master xfer just after completing the
-         * slave mode session.
+         * master command, clear the queued master command and change
+         * its state to 'pending'. To simplify handling of pending
+         * cases, it uses S/W solution instead of H/W command queue
+         * handling.
            */
           if (unlikely(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_SLAVE_MATCH)) {
+            writel(readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
+                ~ASPEED_I2CD_MASTER_CMDS_MASK,
+                   bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG);

Sorry for the late comments (just noticed this line while testing the patch):

I assume this line is aimed at stopping the running master commands, but as per
AST2500 datasheet, it's NOP to write 0 to MASTER_STOP/MASTER_RX/MASTER_TX bits.
Maybe all we need is writing 1 to MASTER_STOP field?

There could be two pending cases:
1. Master goes to pending before it triggers a command if a slave
    operation is already initiated.
2. Master goes to pending after it triggered a command if a peer
    master immediately sends something just after the master command
    triggering.

Above code is for the latter case. H/W handles the case priority based
so the slave event will be handled first, and then the master command
will be handled when the slave operation is completed. Problem is,
this H/W shares the same buffer for master and slave operations so
it's unreliable. Above code just removes the master command from the
command register to prevent this H/W command handling of pending events.
Instead, it restarts the master command using a call of aspeed_i2c_do_start when the slave operation is completed.

Thanks for the clarify, Jae. I mean clearing these bits has no effect to
hardware according to aspeed datasheet; in other word, master command cannot
be removed from command register by this statement.

For example, below is the description for MASTER_STOP_CMD(I2CD14, bit 5):

   0: NOP
   1: Issue Master Stop Command
   This register will be automatically cleared by H/W when Stop Command has
   been issues.

It's removing before H/W fetches the the command so the pending command
isn't cleared by H/W at the timing. If we send a stop command at here, the bus will be messed up.

Thanks,

Jae



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux