On Mon 2019-08-19 02:37:57, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Yes, I believe the integration is neccessary. Using same binding is > > neccessary for that, but not sufficient. For example, we need > > compatible trigger names, too. > > Hi Pavel > > Please could you explain what you mean by compatible trigger names? Well, you attempted to put trigger names in device tree. That means those names should work w.r.t. LED subsystem, too. > > So... I'd really like to see proper integration is possible before we > > merge this. > > Please let me turn that around. What do you see as being impossible at > the moment? What do we need to convince you about? That locking requirements are compatible, that triggers you invented can be implemented by LED subsystem, ... Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
