Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > +#define MAX1X27_CHANNELS(depth) \
> > + MAX1027_T_CHAN, \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(0, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(1, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(2, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(3, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(4, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(5, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(6, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(7, depth)
> > +
> > +#define MAX1X29_CHANNELS(depth) \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(8, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(9, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(10, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(11, depth)
> > +
>
> Modify this a touch so the macro for MAX1X29_CHANNELS includes
> MAX1X27_CHANNELS. That way each macro's name matches what it
> does rather than the 'additional channels' for that device.
Sure.
>
> > +#define MAX1X31_CHANNELS(depth) \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(12, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(13, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(14, depth), \
> > + MAX1027_V_CHAN(15, depth)
> > +
> > static const struct iio_chan_spec max1027_channels[] = {
> > - MAX1027_T_CHAN,
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(0),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(1),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(2),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(3),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(4),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(5),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(6),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(7)
> > + MAX1X27_CHANNELS(10)
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iio_chan_spec max1029_channels[] = {
> > - MAX1027_T_CHAN,
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(0),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(1),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(2),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(3),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(4),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(5),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(6),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(7),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(8),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(9),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(10),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(11)
> > + MAX1X27_CHANNELS(10),
> > + MAX1X29_CHANNELS(10)
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iio_chan_spec max1031_channels[] = {
> > - MAX1027_T_CHAN,
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(0),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(1),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(2),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(3),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(4),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(5),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(6),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(7),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(8),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(9),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(10),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(11),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(12),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(13),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(14),
> > - MAX1027_V_CHAN(15)
> > + MAX1X27_CHANNELS(10),
> > + MAX1X29_CHANNELS(10),
> > + MAX1X31_CHANNELS(10)
> > };
> >
> > static const unsigned long max1027_available_scan_masks[] = {
> > @@ -181,6 +171,7 @@ static const unsigned long max1031_available_scan_masks[] = {
> > struct max1027_chip_info {
> > const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> > unsigned int num_channels;
> > + unsigned int depth;
>
> Could we use the channel real_bits field instead of replicating the info?
I'll try. Indeed I would prefer not to replicate the info.
Thanks,
Miquèl
