Sure. We will re-submit the patches with the revision suggested. Thanks. Regards, Chiawei ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** DISCLAIMER: This message (and any attachments) may contain legally privileged and/or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete the e-mail and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Jae Hyun Yoo [mailto:jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 12:20 AM To: ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jason M Biils <jason.m.bills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>; linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] peci: aspeed: Add AST2600 compatible On 10/2/2019 7:35 PM, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > Hi Jae Hyun, > > Thanks for the feedback. > For now should I use GitHub pull-request to submit the patches of PECI-related change to OpenBMC dev-5.3 tree only? You could submit this patch series to OpenBMC mailing list with [PATCH linux dev-5.3] prefix. Thanks, Jae
