On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:12 AM Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:09:06PM EDT, Rob Herring wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 04:06:37PM -0400, vincent.cheng.xh@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Vincent Cheng <vincent.cheng.xh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Rob, > > Welcome back. Thank-you for providing feedback. > > >> > >> Add device tree binding doc for the IDT ClockMatrix PTP clock driver. > > > >Bindings are for h/w, not drivers... > > Yes, will remove 'driver'. > > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtcm.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/ptp-idtcm.txt > > > >Please make this a DT schema. > > Sure, will give it a try. > > >> + - compatible Should be "idt,8a3400x-ptp" for System Synchronizer > >> + Should be "idt,8a3401x-ptp" for Port Synchronizer > >> + Should be "idt,8a3404x-ptp" for Universal Frequency Translator (UFT) > > > >If PTP is the only function of the chip, you don't need to append > >'-ptp'. > > Okay, will remove '-ptp'. Thanks. > > > >What's the 'x' for? We generally don't use wildcards in compatible > >strings. > > We were hoping to use 'x' to represent a single driver to match the various > part numbers 8A34001, 8A34002, 8A34003, 8A34004, 8A34011, 8A34012, etc. > > What should be used instead of 'x'? Enumerate all the part numbers. Are the differences discoverable in some other way? If so, then 'x' is fine, but just add a note how models are distinguished. Rob