On 04/24/2014 12:22 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: ... > The downside of not allowing the gpiod API to support the -gpio suffix > is that we'll never be able to convert drivers that use such a binding > and will forever have a hodgepodge of GPIO APIs that we need to support. Perhaps rather than making the existing gpiod API automatically search for both -gpios and -gpio, we could make a new API for the other suffix, so that driver indicate explicitly which property name they want. That way, someone can't accidentally write -gpio in the DT and have it still work. Or, add a parameter to the existing API, but that's probably a lot more churn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html