> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 10:40 PM > To: Lucas Stach > Cc: Zhu Richard-R65037; Jingoo Han; Shawn Guo; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-arm; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sean > Cross; Marek Vasut; Ian Campbell; Mark Rutland; Pawel Moll; Rob Herring; Arnd > Bergmann; Tim Harvey; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] i.MX6 PCIe binding change and MSI support > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 24.04.2014, 11:58 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas: > >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:52:51PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > >> > While working on MSI support for the i.MX6 PCIe host driver it has > >> > been discovered that the binding for this host controller is broken > >> > in many ways (refer to the patch descriptions for more > >> > info) and was introduced without proper discussion about what > >> > should/should not be in the binding. > >> > > >> > This series fixes this and minimizes the difference of the > >> > i.MX6 binding to the common designware PCIe binding. I'm aware that > >> > this is a quite radical change, but I think it's justified to do > >> > this as long as there aren't many user of the old binding (most of > >> > the optional properties in the binding aren't even implemented). > >> > > >> > Looking forward to your feedback. > >> > > >> > Lucas Stach (8): > >> > ARM: imx6q-clk: parent lvds_gate from lvds_sel > > This one is already applied. > > > >> > PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings > >> > ARM: dts: imx6: update pcie to bring in line with new binding > >> > PCI: imx6: use new clock names > >> > PCI: imx6: drop old irq mapping > >> > PCI: imx6: rip out optional (and unused) irqs > >> > PCI: designware: make MSI isr shared irq aware > >> > PCI: imx6: add support for MSI > >> > >> What's the status of all these? I would normally apply patches 4-8 > >> of this series through my tree, given the appropriate acks, but I > >> haven't seen those yet. And I'm not sure what dependencies there are > >> between the non-PCI patches and the PCI ones. > >> > > It's a complete binding change, so applying one part without the other > > is going to horribly break things. > > > > So I would at least want to see an ack for the binding change on the > > i.MX side from Shawn and Richard. This will need some follow on > > patches, as some boards adding PCIe using the old binding have cropped > > up in linux-next, but I can do the patches on short notice if everyone > > agrees to merge this patchset. > > > > The designware part is pretty simple and doesn't change anything for > > other users than i.MX. Though I would like to see an ack from Jingoo > > for those. > > > > I have some more stuff in the pipes regarding multiple MSI irqs, that > > depend on this series and also the Keystone people are waiting for > > this to be applied in order to consolidate the clock handling of the > > designware core driver, so it would be nice to get this moving again. [Richard] Hi Lucas, thanks. I'm ok for this patch-set. Acked-by: Richard Zhu <r65037@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > OK, just poke me again when you're ready for me to do something with these. > > Bjorn > Best Regards Richard Zhu ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
