Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-09-16 08:45:40)
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
>
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
>
> While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
> "owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.
>
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
I can apply this to clk-next?
