On 16.09.2019 14:02, Brian Masney wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 01:32:58PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 16/9/19 12:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Brian, >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:36:14AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>>> On 15.08.2019 02:48, Brian Masney wrote: >>>>>> When attempting to configure this driver on a Nexus 5 phone (msm8974), >>>>>> setting up the dummy i2c bus for TX_P0 would fail due to an -EBUSY >>>>>> error. The downstream MSM kernel sources [1] shows that the proper value >>>>>> for TX_P0 is 0x78, not 0x70, so correct the value to allow device >>>>>> probing to succeed. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/AICP/kernel_lge_hammerhead/blob/n7.1/drivers/video/slimport/slimport_tx_reg.h >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.h | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.h >>>>>> index 25e063bcecbc..bc511fc605c9 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.h >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.h >>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ >>>>>> #ifndef __ANX78xx_H >>>>>> #define __ANX78xx_H >>>>>> >>>>>> -#define TX_P0 0x70 >>>>>> +#define TX_P0 0x78 >>>>> >>>>> This bothers me little. There are no upstream users, grepping android >>>>> sources suggests that both values can be used [1][2] (grep for "#define >>>>> TX_P0"), moreover there is code suggesting both values can be valid [3]. >>>>> >>>>> Could you verify datasheet which i2c slave addresses are valid for this >>>>> chip, if both I guess this patch should be reworked. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-flo-3.4-jb-mr2/drivers/misc/slimport_anx7808/slimport_tx_reg.h >>>>> >>>>> [2]: >>>>> https://github.com/AndroidGX/SimpleGX-MM-6.0_H815_20d/blob/master/drivers/video/slimport/anx7812/slimport7812_tx_reg.h >>>>> >>>>> [3]: >>>>> https://github.com/commaai/android_kernel_leeco_msm8996/blob/master/drivers/video/msm/mdss/dp/slimport_custom_declare.h#L73 >>>> This address is 0x78 on my Nexus 5. Given [3] above it looks like we >>>> need to support both addresses. What do you think about moving these >>>> addresses into device tree? >>> Assuming that the device supports different addresses (I can't validate >>> that as I don't have access to the datasheet), and different addresses >>> need to be used on different systems, then the address to be used needs >>> to be provided by the firmware (DT in this case). Two options are >>> possible, either specifying the address explicitly in the device's DT >>> node, or specifying free addresses (in the form of a white list or black >>> list) and allocating an address from that pool. The latter has been >>> discussed in a BoF at the Linux Plumbers Conference last week, >>> https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/4/contributions/542/. >>> >>>> The downstream and upstream kernel sources divide these addresses by two >>>> to get the i2c address. Here's the code in upstream: >>>> >>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.c#L1353 >>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix-anx78xx.c#L41 >>>> >>>> I'm not sure why the actual i2c address isn't used in this code. >> The ANX7802/12/14/16 has a slave I2C bus that provides the interface to access >> or control the chip from the AP. The I2C slave addresses used to control the >> ANX7802/12/14/16 are 70h, 72h, 7Ah, 7Eh and 80h. Every address allows you to >> access to different registers of the chip and AFAICS is not configurable. >> >> I don't think these addresses should be configured via DT but for the driver itself. >> >> My wild guess is that the ANX7808 has different addresses, but I don't have the >> datasheet of this version. > I'm able to communicate with the 7808 on my Nexus 5 using the 0x78 > address. Given that the addresses appear to be fixed per model, maybe it > makes sense to drop the address #defines and add the addresses to the > data pointer in the driver's of_match_table like so: > > static const struct of_device_id anx78xx_match_table[] = { > { .compatible = "analogix,anx7808", .data = PTR_TO_7808_ADDRS }, > { .compatible = "analogix,anx7812", .data = PTR_TO_781X_ADDRS }, > { .compatible = "analogix,anx7814", .data = PTR_TO_781X_ADDRS }, > { .compatible = "analogix,anx7818", .data = PTR_TO_781X_ADDRS }, > { /* sentinel */ }, > }; With given feedback from other users and lack of datasheets for chips (except anx7814) we can try this approach. Regards Andrzej > > Brian > >
