On 9/13/2019 6:12 PM, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 05:20:26PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
On 9/12/2019 6:49 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:23:31, Dilip Kota
<eswara.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, I just return from parental leave, therefore I still trying to get
the pace in mailing list discussion.
However your suggestion looks good, I agree that can go into DesignWare
driver to be available to all.
Thanks Gustavo for the confirmation, i will add it in the next patch version
Just a small request, please do in general:
s/designware/DesignWare
Sorry, i didnt understand this.
It means the reviewer asks you to name DesignWare in this form,
i.o.w. designware -> DesignWare.
`man 1 sed` gives you more about it :-)
Thanks Andy for clarifying it.
Could you please also comment let me know your opinion on the driver
naming. Below is the mail snippet.
======
>>> Add support to PCIe RC controller on Intel Universal
>>> Gateway SoC. PCIe controller is based of Synopsys
>>> Designware pci core.
>>> +config PCIE_INTEL_AXI
> [Andy]: I think that name here is too generic. Classical x86 seems
not using this.
[Dilip Kota]:
This PCIe driver is for the Intel Gateway SoCs. So how about naming it is as
"pcie-intel-gw"; pcie-intel-gw.c and Kconfig as PCIE_INTEL_GW.
Andrew Murray is ok with this naming, please let me know your view.
=======
Regards,
Dilip