Hi Bjorn, On 9/4/19 07:22, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 20 Aug 02:34 PDT 2019, Georgi Djakov wrote: > >> Hi Stan, >> >> On 8/14/19 11:47, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >>> This aims to add a requests for bandwidth scaling depending >>> on the resolution and framerate (macroblocks per second). The >>> exact value ff the requested bandwidth is get from a >> >> s/ff/of/ >> >>> pre-calculated tables for encoder and decoder. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 34 +++++++++++ >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h | 14 +++++ >>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> It looks like venus can be built-in, so how about the case when venus is >> built-in and the interconnect provider is a module? Maybe add a dependency in >> Kconfig to depend on INTERCONNECT || !INTERCONNECT? >> > > I've been struggling down this road for remoteproc et al for a long > time, I strongly suggest that you make the INTERCONNECT config bool, to > ensure that we don't see this problem for every client. Thanks for the comment. Well, i was expecting that we will have to make it bool one day. Viresh actually already sent a patch [1]. Maybe you can add an Ack? > > The interconnect framework should hide the fact that the provider is > module. > Correct. > > But with this in place is there actually a dependency? Won't the include > file provide stubs in the case of !INTERCONNECT? There are stubs, so we are fine. Thanks, Georgi [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/b789cce388dd1f2906492f307dea6780c398bc6a.1567065991.git.viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx/