[+James]
Hi Talel,
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:05:09 +0100,
Talel Shenhar <talel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The Amazon's Annapurna Labs SoCs includes Point Of Serialization error
> logging unit that reports an error in case write error (e.g. attempt to
> write to a read only register).
> This patch introduces the support for this unit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Talel Shenhar <talel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig | 5 ++
> drivers/soc/amazon/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 142 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amazon/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e7a47b5..8c3a070 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -751,6 +751,13 @@ F: drivers/tty/serial/altera_jtaguart.c
> F: include/linux/altera_uart.h
> F: include/linux/altera_jtaguart.h
>
> +AMAZON ANNAPURNA LABS POS
> +M: Talel Shenhar <talel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +M: Talel Shenhar <talelshenhar@xxxxxxxxx>
> +S: Maintained
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/amazon/amazon,al-pos.txt
> +F: drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c
> +
> AMAZON ANNAPURNA LABS THERMAL MMIO DRIVER
> M: Talel Shenhar <talel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> S: Maintained
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
> index 833e04a..913a6b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> menu "SOC (System On Chip) specific Drivers"
>
> source "drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig"
> +source "drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/soc/aspeed/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/soc/atmel/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index 2ec3550..c1c5c64 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS) += actions/
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_ASPEED) += aspeed/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) += atmel/
> +obj-y += amazon/
> obj-y += bcm/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DOVE) += dove/
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_DOVE) += dove/
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..fdd4cdd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/amazon/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +config AL_POS
> + bool "Amazon's Annapurna Labs POS driver"
Some would say that the name is ever slightly unfortunate...
> + depends on ARCH_ALPINE || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Include support for the SoC POS error capability.
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amazon/Makefile b/drivers/soc/amazon/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..a31441a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/amazon/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +obj-$(CONFIG_AL_POS) += al_pos.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c b/drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..a865111
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/amazon/al_pos.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
> +/* Registers Offset */
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1 0x0
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_0 0x4
> +
> +/* Registers Fields */
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_VALID GENMASK(31, 31)
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_BRESP GENMASK(18, 17)
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_REQUEST_ID GENMASK(16, 8)
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_ADDR_HIGH GENMASK(7, 0)
> +
> +#define AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_0_ADDR_LOW GENMASK(31, 0)
> +
> +static int al_pos_panic;
> +module_param(al_pos_panic, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(al_pos_panic, "Defines if POS error is causing panic()");
> +
> +struct al_pos {
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + void __iomem *mmio_base;
> + int irq;
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t al_pos_irq_handler(int irq, void *info)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = info;
> + struct al_pos *pos = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + u32 log1;
> + u32 log0;
> + u64 addr;
> + u16 request_id;
> + u8 bresp;
> +
> + log1 = readl(pos->mmio_base + AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1);
Do you actually need the implied barriers? I'd expect that relaxed
accesses should be enough.
> + if (!FIELD_GET(AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_VALID, log1))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + log0 = readl(pos->mmio_base + AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_0);
> + writel(0, pos->mmio_base + AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1);
> +
> + addr = FIELD_GET(AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_0_ADDR_LOW, log0);
> + addr |= (FIELD_GET(AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_ADDR_HIGH, log1) << 32);
> + request_id = FIELD_GET(AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_REQUEST_ID, log1);
> + bresp = FIELD_GET(AL_POS_ERROR_LOG_1_BRESP, log1);
> +
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "addr=0x%llx request_id=0x%x bresp=0x%x\n",
> + addr, request_id, bresp);
What is this information? How do we make use of it? Given that this is
asynchronous, how do we correlate it to the offending software?
> +
> + if (al_pos_panic)
> + panic("POS");
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int al_pos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct al_pos *pos;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pos = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pos), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pos)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pos);
> + pos->pdev = pdev;
> +
> + pos->mmio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(pos->mmio_base)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap memory (%ld)\n",
> + PTR_ERR(pos->mmio_base));
> + return PTR_ERR(pos->mmio_base);
> + }
> +
> + pos->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (pos->irq <= 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to parse and map irq\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> + pos->irq,
> + al_pos_irq_handler,
> + 0,
> + pdev->name,
> + pdev);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "failed to register to irq %d (%d)\n",
> + pos->irq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "successfully loaded\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id al_pos_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "amazon,al-pos", },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, al_pos_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver al_pos_driver = {
> + .probe = al_pos_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "al-pos",
> + .of_match_table = al_pos_of_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(al_pos_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Talel Shenhar");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Amazon's Annapurna Labs POS driver");
> --
> 2.7.4
>
The whole think looks to me like a poor man's EDAC handling, and I'd
expect to be plugged in that subsystem instead. Any reason why this
isn't the case? It would certainly make the handling uniform for the
user.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
