On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
> > On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> > > NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@30350000 {
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-
> > ocotp", "syscon";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
> > > reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
> > > clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
> > > /* For nvmem subnodes */
> >
> > Why not fold the two patches?
>
> For i.MX8MM, it just removes the incorrect fallback compatible, for i.MX8MN, it needs
> to replace the incorrect fallback compatible in order to support SoC UID read, so I think
> this should be 2 separate patch?
Oh, yes, there is a subtle difference in the file name :) m|n. I understand
now why you splitted it.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
