On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:18:44 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's not just for the lastest kernel. We must maintain backward > > compatibility here too. If there use to be a usage of this, then we > > must keep it until the kernels are no longer used (perhaps 7 years?) > > That argues for not using "%pfw" at all for some number of years. > > Perhaps the '%pfw' should be '%pnfw' for 'name' and 'fwnode' -ENOCOMPREHENSION -- Steve
