On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:22:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 07:10:51PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:13:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:57:32PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Add a test for the %pfw printk modifier using software nodes.
> > >
> > > > +static void __init fwnode_pointer(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + const struct software_node softnodes[] = {
> > > > + { .name = "first", },
> > > > + { .name = "second", .parent = &softnodes[0], },
> > > > + { .name = "third", .parent = &softnodes[1], },
> > > > + { NULL /* Guardian */ },
> > >
> > > Comma is still here :-)
> >
> > Oops. I ended up removing the comma in a wrong patch which wasn't submitted
> > to the list. Will fix for v6.
>
> Also you may remove NULL there since it's default.
Then it'd become GCC specific. Albeit I'm not sure that's any kind of a
problem in practice. I guess Clang must cope with that, too? Still, I
prefer not to use compiler specific syntax if there's no need to.
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
