Hi Joe,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:38:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 16:57 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This set adds functionality into the device property API (counting a
> > node's parents as well as obtaining its name) in order to support printing
> > fwnode names using a new conversion specifier "%pfw". The names that are
> > produced are equivalent to its OF counterpart "%pOF" on OF systems for the
> > two supported modifiers ("f" and "P").
> >
> > Printing a node's name is something that's been available on OF for a long
> > time and if something is converted to device property API (such as the
> > V4L2 fwnode framework) it always got removed of a nice feature that was
> > sometimes essential in debugging. With this set, that no longer is the
> > case.
>
> Doesn't this still have dependencies on removing all
> existing %p[fF] uses?
>
> In Linus' tree:
>
> tools/lib/traceevent/Documentation/libtraceevent-func_apis.txt:or events have "%pF" or "%pS" parameter in its format string. It is common to
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c: if (asprintf(&format, "%%pf: (NO FORMAT FOUND at %llx)\n", addr) < 0)
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c: if (asprintf(&format, "%s: %s", "%pf", printk->printk) < 0)
>
> And these in -next:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c: "3185 FIND node filter %pf DID "
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c: "3186 FIND node filter %pf NOT FOUND.\n", filter);
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c: "(%d):0307 Mailbox cmd x%x (x%x/x%x) Cmpl %pf "
Thanks for bringing these up.
I'll submit patches to address both.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
