Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Nicolas,

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Nicolas Pitre
<nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>
>> Add machine-dependent MCPM call-backs for Exynos5420. These are used
>> to power up/down the secondary CPUs during boot, shutdown, s2r and
>> switching.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Getting there!  See comments below.
>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..49b9031
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + *           http://www.samsung.com
>> + *
>> + * arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c
>> + *
>> + * Based on arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/arm-cci.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/mcpm.h>
>> +#include <asm/cputype.h>
>> +#include <asm/cp15.h>
>> +
>> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
>> +#include "regs-pmu.h"
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER  4
>> +#define EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS               2
>> +
>> +/* Secondary CPU entry point */
>> +#define REG_ENTRY_ADDR               (S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1C)
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN             0x3
>> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS            0x0
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION              S5P_PMUREG(0x2500)
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION          S5P_PMUREG(0x2600)
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr)   \
>> +                     (S5P_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr)          \
>> +                     (S5P_ARM_CORE0_STATUS + ((_nr) * 0x80))
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr)     \
>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
>> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(_nr)            \
>> +                     (EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
>> +
>> +#define EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr)         \
>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80))
>> +#define EXYNOS_L2_STATUS(_nr)                        \
>> +                     (EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The common v7_exit_coherency_flush API could not be used because of the
>> + * Erratum 799270 workaround. This macro is the same as the common one (in
>> + * arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h) except for the erratum handling.
>> + */
>> +#define exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(level) \
>> +     asm volatile( \
>> +     "stmfd  sp!, {fp, ip}\n\t"\
>> +     "mrc    p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0   @ get SCTLR\n\t" \
>> +     "bic    r0, r0, #"__stringify(CR_C)"\n\t" \
>> +     "mcr    p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0   @ set SCTLR\n\t" \
>> +     "isb\n\t"\
>> +     "bl     v7_flush_dcache_"__stringify(level)"\n\t" \
>> +     "clrex\n\t"\
>> +     "mrc    p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1   @ get ACTLR\n\t" \
>> +     "bic    r0, r0, #(1 << 6)       @ disable local coherency\n\t" \
>> +     /* Dummy Load of a device register to avoid Erratum 799270 */ \
>> +     "ldr    r4, [%0]\n\t" \
>> +     "and    r4, r4, #0\n\t" \
>> +     "orr    r0, r0, r4\n\t" \
>> +     "mcr    p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1   @ set ACTLR\n\t" \
>> +     "isb\n\t" \
>> +     "dsb\n\t" \
>> +     "ldmfd  sp!, {fp, ip}" \
>> +     : \
>> +     : "Ir" (S5P_INFORM0) \
>> +     : "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", \
>> +       "r9", "r10", "lr", "memory")
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible
>> + * for an outbound CPU to call power_down() after its inbound counterpart
>> + * is already live using the same logical CPU number which trips lockdep
>> + * debugging.
>> + */
>> +static arch_spinlock_t exynos_mcpm_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>> +static int
>> +cpu_use_count[EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER][EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS];
>> +
>> +static bool exynos_core_power_state(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int val;
>> +     unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
>> +
>> +     val = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpunr)) &
>> +                             EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
>> +     return !!val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void exynos_core_power_control(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster,
>> +                                             int enable)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
>> +     unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER);
>> +
>> +     if (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) == enable)
>> +             return;
>
> I think this isn't right.
>
> Normally, the power _status_ and the power _control_ are not always in
> sync.  It is possible for the power control to be set to OFF but the
> status won't reflect that until the CPU has executed WFI for example.
>
> Here we don't care about the actual status.  What matters is the
> control.  In the exynos_power_up case, if the control bit says "power
> off" but the status bit says "it isn't off yet" then the code won't turn
> the control bit back on.
>
> For example, it should be possible for CPU1 to call exynos_power_up()
> while CPU0 is still executing code in exynos_power_down() right after
> releasing exynos_mcpm_lock but before WFI is executed.  There is a cache
> flush during that window which might take some time to execute, making
> this scenario more likely that you might think.
>
> What we want here is simply to set the power control bit back on.  No
> need to test its previous status as the value of cpu_use_count already
> reflects it.  And if the affected CPU didn't reach WFI yet, then the
> execution of WFI will simply return and the CPU will be soft rebooted.
>
> And in the exynos_power_down() case the CPU turning the control bit off
> is always doing so for itself, therefore its status bit must obviously
> show that it is running.  Testing it is therefore redundant.
>
> Therefore you should be able to simplify this greatly.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I will remove the status checks
and only activate the control bits.
>
>> +     if (enable)
>> +             val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
>> +     __raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpunr));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void exynos_cluster_power_control(unsigned int cluster, int enable)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20);
>> +     unsigned int status, val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS;
>> +
>> +     if (enable)
>> +             val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN;
>> +
>> +     status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
>> +     if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
>> +             return;
>
> Same comment as above.  You shouldn't need to check current status
> before adjusting the wanted control.  If you get here that's because the
> control is never what you want it to be.
OK.
>
>> +     __raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(cluster));
>> +     /* Wait until cluster power control is applied */
>> +     while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> +             status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster));
>> +
>> +             if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val)
>> +                     return;
>> +
>> +             cpu_relax();
>> +     }
>
> As mentioned in a previous email, it is possible for the CPU executing
> this code to be the only CPU currently alive.  And in this code path
> IRQs are disabled.  That means nothing will ever increase jiffies in
> that case and the timeout will never expire.
>
> If in practice there is only a few loops to perform here, I'd suggest
> simply looping, say, 100 times and bail out if that fails.
>
> Oh and if the poll loop fails then you must turn the power control back
> off and return an error via exynos_power_up().
Will change the polling loop and add error handling in case of failure..
>
>> +     pr_warn("timed out waiting for cluster %u to power %s\n", cluster,
>> +             enable ? "on" : "off");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
>> +{
>> +     pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
>> +     if (cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
>> +             cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS)
>> +             return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * Since this is called with IRQs enabled, and no arch_spin_lock_irq
>> +      * variant exists, we need to disable IRQs manually here.
>> +      */
>> +     local_irq_disable();
>> +     arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>> +
>> +     cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]++;
>> +     if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
>> +             bool was_cluster_down =
>> +                     __mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) == CLUSTER_DOWN;
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * Turn on the cluster (L2/COMMON) and then power on the cores.
>> +              * TODO: Turn off the clusters when all cores in the cluster
>> +              * are down to achieve significant power savings.
>> +              */
>> +             if (was_cluster_down)
>> +                     exynos_cluster_power_control(cluster, 1);
>> +             exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 1);
>> +
>> +             /* CPU should be powered up there */
>> +             /* Also setup Cluster Power Sequence here */
>> +     } else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] != 2) {
>> +             /*
>> +              * The only possible values are:
>> +              * 0 = CPU down
>> +              * 1 = CPU (still) up
>> +              * 2 = CPU requested to be up before it had a chance
>> +              *     to actually make itself down.
>> +              * Any other value is a bug.
>> +              */
>> +             BUG();
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>> +     local_irq_enable();
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void exynos_power_down(void)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster, cpumask;
>> +     bool last_man = false, skip_wfi = false;
>> +
>> +     mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
>> +     cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
>> +     cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
>> +     cpumask = (1 << cpu);
>> +
>> +     pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
>> +     BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
>> +                     cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
>> +
>> +     __mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster);
>> +
>> +     arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>> +     BUG_ON(__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) != CLUSTER_UP);
>> +     cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]--;
>> +     if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 0) {
>> +             int cnt = 0, i;
>> +
>> +             exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 0);
>> +             for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER; i++)
>> +                     cnt += cpu_use_count[i][cluster];
>> +             if (cnt == 0)
>> +                     last_man = true;
>> +     } else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) {
>> +             /*
>> +              * A power_up request went ahead of us.
>> +              * Even if we do not want to shut this CPU down,
>> +              * the caller expects a certain state as if the WFI
>> +              * was aborted.  So let's continue with cache cleaning.
>> +              */
>> +             skip_wfi = true;
>> +     } else {
>> +             BUG();
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) {
>> +             arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>> +
>> +             /* Flush all cache levels for this cluster. */
>> +             exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(all);
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * Disable cluster-level coherency by masking
>> +              * incoming snoops and DVM messages:
>> +              */
>> +             cci_disable_port_by_cpu(mpidr);
>> +
>> +             __mcpm_outbound_leave_critical(cluster, CLUSTER_DOWN);
>> +     } else {
>> +             arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock);
>> +
>> +             /* Disable and flush the local CPU cache. */
>> +             exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     __mcpm_cpu_down(cpu, cluster);
>> +
>> +     /* Now we are prepared for power-down, do it: */
>> +     if (!skip_wfi)
>> +             wfi();
>> +
>> +     /* Not dead at this point?  Let our caller cope. */
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster)
>> +{
>> +     pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
>> +     BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER ||
>> +                     cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
>> +
>> +     /* Wait for the core state to be OFF */
>> +     while (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) != 0x0)
>> +             ;
>> +
>
> *Here* is the place to actually establish a timeout.  Please see
> tc2_pm_power_down_finish() for example.
>
> Also beware that this method is going to be renamed once RMK applies the
> following patch:
>
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8029/1
>
I will re-work this function referencing the tc2 code. v3 will be posted soon.

Regards,
Abhilash
>
>
>
>
>> +     return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops exynos_power_ops = {
>> +     .power_up               = exynos_power_up,
>> +     .power_down             = exynos_power_down,
>> +     .power_down_finish      = exynos_power_down_finish,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void __init exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(void)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster;
>> +
>> +     mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
>> +     cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
>> +     cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
>> +
>> +     pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster);
>> +     BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER  ||
>> +                     cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS);
>> +
>> +     cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] = 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Enable cluster-level coherency, in preparation for turning on the MMU.
>> + */
>> +static void __naked exynos_pm_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level)
>> +{
>> +     asm volatile ("\n"
>> +     "cmp    r0, #1\n"
>> +     "bxne   lr\n"
>> +     "b      cci_enable_port_for_self");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init exynos_mcpm_init(void)
>> +{
>> +     int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +     if (!soc_is_exynos5420())
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +     if (!cci_probed())
>> +             return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * To increase the stability of KFC reset we need to program
>> +      * the PMU SPARE3 register
>> +      */
>> +     __raw_writel(EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL, S5P_PMU_SPARE3);
>> +
>> +     exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init();
>> +
>> +     ret = mcpm_platform_register(&exynos_power_ops);
>> +     if (!ret)
>> +             ret = mcpm_sync_init(exynos_pm_power_up_setup);
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>> +     mcpm_smp_set_ops();
>> +
>> +     pr_info("Exynos MCPM support installed\n");
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * Future entries into the kernel can now go
>> +      * through the cluster entry vectors.
>> +      */
>> +     __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(mcpm_entry_point),
>> +             REG_ENTRY_ADDR);
>> +
>> +     return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +early_initcall(exynos_mcpm_init);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>> index cfbfc575..43fe7a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>  #define S5P_INFORM5                          S5P_PMUREG(0x0814)
>>  #define S5P_INFORM6                          S5P_PMUREG(0x0818)
>>  #define S5P_INFORM7                          S5P_PMUREG(0x081C)
>> +#define S5P_PMU_SPARE3                               S5P_PMUREG(0x090C)
>>
>>  #define EXYNOS_IROM_DATA2                    S5P_PMUREG(0x0988)
>>
>> @@ -540,5 +541,6 @@
>>  #define EXYNOS5420_KFC_USE_STANDBY_WFE3                              (1 << 23)
>>
>>  #define DUR_WAIT_RESET                               0xF
>> +#define EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL           0x3
>>
>>  #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_PMU_H */
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux