Hi Daniel, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/22/2014 08:17 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >> >> Add machine-dependent MCPM call-backs for Exynos5420. These are used >> to power up/down the secondary CPUs during boot, shutdown, s2r and >> switching. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 8 + >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 2 + >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c | 345 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 2 + >> 4 files changed, 357 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> index fc8bf18..1602abc 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> @@ -110,4 +110,12 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5440 >> >> endmenu >> >> +config EXYNOS5420_MCPM >> + bool "Exynos5420 Multi-Cluster PM support" >> + depends on MCPM && SOC_EXYNOS5420 >> + select ARM_CCI >> + help >> + This is needed to provide CPU and cluster power management >> + on Exynos5420 implementing big.LITTLE. >> + >> endif >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile >> index a656dbe..01bc9b9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile >> @@ -29,3 +29,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += firmware.o >> >> plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec) >> AFLAGS_exynos-smc.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec) >> + >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS5420_MCPM) += mcpm-exynos.o >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..49b9031 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> + * http://www.samsung.com >> + * >> + * arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c >> + * >> + * Based on arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >> +#include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> >> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> >> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h> >> +#include <linux/fs.h> >> +#include <linux/delay.h> >> +#include <linux/arm-cci.h> >> + >> +#include <asm/mcpm.h> >> +#include <asm/cputype.h> >> +#include <asm/cp15.h> >> + >> +#include <plat/cpu.h> >> +#include "regs-pmu.h" >> + >> +#define EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER 4 >> +#define EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS 2 >> + >> +/* Secondary CPU entry point */ >> +#define REG_ENTRY_ADDR (S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1C) >> + >> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN 0x3 >> +#define EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS 0x0 >> >> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2500) >> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2600) >> + >> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >> + (S5P_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80)) >> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \ >> + (S5P_ARM_CORE0_STATUS + ((_nr) * 0x80)) >> + >> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >> + (EXYNOS_ARM_COMMON_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80)) >> +#define EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(_nr) \ >> + (EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) >> + >> +#define EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >> + (EXYNOS_ARM_L2_CONFIGURATION + ((_nr) * 0x80)) >> +#define EXYNOS_L2_STATUS(_nr) \ >> + (EXYNOS_L2_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) >> + > > > Is it possible to share the definition of those macros with the rest of the > code via functions, so they can be re-used for the other sub-systems ? eg: > https://patches.linaro.org/27798/ OK..I will work on making wrapper functions for these. Would these new functions be better placed in the mcpm code or the pm code ? > > >> +/* >> + * The common v7_exit_coherency_flush API could not be used because of >> the >> + * Erratum 799270 workaround. This macro is the same as the common one >> (in >> + * arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h) except for the erratum handling. >> + */ >> +#define exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(level) \ >> + asm volatile( \ >> + "stmfd sp!, {fp, ip}\n\t"\ >> + "mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 @ get SCTLR\n\t" \ >> + "bic r0, r0, #"__stringify(CR_C)"\n\t" \ >> + "mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 @ set SCTLR\n\t" \ >> + "isb\n\t"\ >> + "bl v7_flush_dcache_"__stringify(level)"\n\t" \ >> + "clrex\n\t"\ >> + "mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 @ get ACTLR\n\t" \ >> + "bic r0, r0, #(1 << 6) @ disable local coherency\n\t" \ >> + /* Dummy Load of a device register to avoid Erratum 799270 */ \ > > > Wouldn't make sense to add the erratum in the Kconfig and re-use it in the > generic v7_exit_coherency_flush macro instead of redefining it ? I am re-looking at the necessity of this after Nicolas' comments. > > >> + "ldr r4, [%0]\n\t" \ >> + "and r4, r4, #0\n\t" \ >> + "orr r0, r0, r4\n\t" \ >> + "mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 @ set ACTLR\n\t" \ >> + "isb\n\t" \ >> + "dsb\n\t" \ >> + "ldmfd sp!, {fp, ip}" \ >> + : \ >> + : "Ir" (S5P_INFORM0) \ >> + : "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", \ >> + "r9", "r10", "lr", "memory") > > > > >> +/* >> + * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible >> + * for an outbound CPU to call power_down() after its inbound counterpart >> + * is already live using the same logical CPU number which trips lockdep >> + * debugging. >> + */ >> +static arch_spinlock_t exynos_mcpm_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; >> +static int >> +cpu_use_count[EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER][EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS]; >> + >> +static bool exynos_core_power_state(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int >> cluster) >> +{ >> + unsigned int val; >> + unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * >> EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER); >> + >> + val = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpunr)) & >> + EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN; >> + return !!val; >> +} >> + >> +static void exynos_core_power_control(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int >> cluster, >> + int enable) >> +{ >> + unsigned int val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS; >> + unsigned int cpunr = cpu + (cluster * >> EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER); >> + >> + if (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) == enable) >> + return; >> + >> + if (enable) >> + val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN; >> + __raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpunr)); >> +} > > > Same comment as above about sharing these functions. > > Shouldn't these functions to be reused by hotplug ? > > >> +static void exynos_cluster_power_control(unsigned int cluster, int >> enable) >> +{ >> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20); >> + unsigned int status, val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_DIS; >> + >> + if (enable) >> + val = EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN; >> + >> + status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster)); >> + if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val) >> + return; >> + >> + __raw_writel(val, EXYNOS_COMMON_CONFIGURATION(cluster)); >> + /* Wait until cluster power control is applied */ >> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) { >> + status = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_COMMON_STATUS(cluster)); >> + >> + if ((status & EXYNOS_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) == val) >> + return; >> + >> + cpu_relax(); >> + } >> + pr_warn("timed out waiting for cluster %u to power %s\n", cluster, >> + enable ? "on" : "off"); >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) >> +{ >> + pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster); >> + if (cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER || >> + cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Since this is called with IRQs enabled, and no >> arch_spin_lock_irq >> + * variant exists, we need to disable IRQs manually here. >> + */ >> + local_irq_disable(); >> + arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock); >> + >> + cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]++; >> + if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) { >> + bool was_cluster_down = >> + __mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) == CLUSTER_DOWN; >> + >> + /* >> + * Turn on the cluster (L2/COMMON) and then power on the >> cores. >> + * TODO: Turn off the clusters when all cores in the >> cluster >> + * are down to achieve significant power savings. >> + */ >> + if (was_cluster_down) >> + exynos_cluster_power_control(cluster, 1); >> + exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 1); >> + >> + /* CPU should be powered up there */ >> + /* Also setup Cluster Power Sequence here */ >> + } else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] != 2) { >> + /* >> + * The only possible values are: >> + * 0 = CPU down >> + * 1 = CPU (still) up >> + * 2 = CPU requested to be up before it had a chance >> + * to actually make itself down. >> + * Any other value is a bug. >> + */ >> + BUG(); >> + } >> + >> + arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock); >> + local_irq_enable(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void exynos_power_down(void) >> +{ >> + unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster, cpumask; >> + bool last_man = false, skip_wfi = false; >> + >> + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr(); >> + cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0); >> + cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1); >> + cpumask = (1 << cpu); > > > This variable is not used. Will remove. > > >> + >> + pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster); >> + BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER || >> + cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS); >> + >> + __mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster); >> + >> + arch_spin_lock(&exynos_mcpm_lock); >> + BUG_ON(__mcpm_cluster_state(cluster) != CLUSTER_UP); >> + cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster]--; >> + if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 0) { >> + int cnt = 0, i; >> + >> + exynos_core_power_control(cpu, cluster, 0); >> + for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER; i++) >> + cnt += cpu_use_count[i][cluster]; >> + if (cnt == 0) >> + last_man = true; >> + } else if (cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] == 1) { >> + /* >> + * A power_up request went ahead of us. >> + * Even if we do not want to shut this CPU down, >> + * the caller expects a certain state as if the WFI >> + * was aborted. So let's continue with cache cleaning. >> + */ >> + skip_wfi = true; >> + } else { >> + BUG(); >> + } >> + >> + if (last_man && __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(cpu, cluster)) { >> + arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock); >> + >> + /* Flush all cache levels for this cluster. */ >> + exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(all); >> + >> + /* >> + * Disable cluster-level coherency by masking >> + * incoming snoops and DVM messages: >> + */ >> + cci_disable_port_by_cpu(mpidr); >> + >> + __mcpm_outbound_leave_critical(cluster, CLUSTER_DOWN); >> + } else { >> + arch_spin_unlock(&exynos_mcpm_lock); >> + >> + /* Disable and flush the local CPU cache. */ >> + exynos_v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis); >> + } >> + >> + __mcpm_cpu_down(cpu, cluster); >> + >> + /* Now we are prepared for power-down, do it: */ >> + if (!skip_wfi) >> + wfi(); >> + >> + /* Not dead at this point? Let our caller cope. */ >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int >> cluster) >> +{ >> + pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster); >> + BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER || >> + cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS); >> + >> + /* Wait for the core state to be OFF */ >> + while (exynos_core_power_state(cpu, cluster) != 0x0) >> + ; > > > As this is a potential infinite loop, a timeout may be desirable, no ? Will be re-working this function. > > >> + >> + return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */ >> +} >> + >> +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops exynos_power_ops = { >> + .power_up = exynos_power_up, >> + .power_down = exynos_power_down, >> + .power_down_finish = exynos_power_down_finish, >> +}; >> + >> +static void __init exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(void) >> +{ >> + unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster; >> + >> + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr(); >> + cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0); >> + cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1); >> + >> + pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster); >> + BUG_ON(cpu >= EXYNOS5420_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER || >> + cluster >= EXYNOS5420_NR_CLUSTERS); >> + >> + cpu_use_count[cpu][cluster] = 1; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * Enable cluster-level coherency, in preparation for turning on the MMU. >> + */ >> +static void __naked exynos_pm_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) >> +{ >> + asm volatile ("\n" >> + "cmp r0, #1\n" >> + "bxne lr\n" >> + "b cci_enable_port_for_self"); >> +} >> + >> +static int __init exynos_mcpm_init(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + if (!soc_is_exynos5420()) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + if (!cci_probed()) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + /* >> + * To increase the stability of KFC reset we need to program >> + * the PMU SPARE3 register >> + */ >> + __raw_writel(EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL, S5P_PMU_SPARE3); >> + >> + exynos_mcpm_usage_count_init(); >> + >> + ret = mcpm_platform_register(&exynos_power_ops); >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = mcpm_sync_init(exynos_pm_power_up_setup); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + mcpm_smp_set_ops(); >> + >> + pr_info("Exynos MCPM support installed\n"); >> + >> + /* >> + * Future entries into the kernel can now go >> + * through the cluster entry vectors. >> + */ >> + __raw_writel(virt_to_phys(mcpm_entry_point), >> + REG_ENTRY_ADDR); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +early_initcall(exynos_mcpm_init); >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >> b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >> index cfbfc575..43fe7a0 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ >> #define S5P_INFORM5 S5P_PMUREG(0x0814) >> #define S5P_INFORM6 S5P_PMUREG(0x0818) >> #define S5P_INFORM7 S5P_PMUREG(0x081C) >> +#define S5P_PMU_SPARE3 S5P_PMUREG(0x090C) >> >> #define EXYNOS_IROM_DATA2 S5P_PMUREG(0x0988) >> >> @@ -540,5 +541,6 @@ >> #define EXYNOS5420_KFC_USE_STANDBY_WFE3 (1 >> << 23) >> >> #define DUR_WAIT_RESET 0xF >> +#define EXYNOS5420_SWRESET_KFC_SEL 0x3 >> >> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_REGS_PMU_H */ >> > > > -- > <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > > Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | > <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | > <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
