On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 10:25, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:58 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 13:54, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:54 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Convert Samsung Exynos Power Management Unit (PMU) bindings to DT schema > > > > format using json-schema. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 72 -------------- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..818c6f3488ef > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: Samsung Exynos SoC series Power Management Unit (PMU) > > > > + > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > + > > > > +properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + items: > > > > + - enum: > > > > + - samsung,exynos3250-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos4210-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos4412-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos5250-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos5260-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos5410-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos5420-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos5433-pmu > > > > + - samsung,exynos7-pmu > > > > + - const: syscon > > > > + > > > > + reg: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + > > > > + '#clock-cells': > > > > + const: 1 > > > > + > > > > + clock-names: > > > > + description: > > > > + list of clock names for particular CLKOUT mux inputs > > > > + # TODO: what is the maximum number of elements (mux inputs)? > > > > + minItems: 1 > > > > + maxItems: 32 > > > > + items: > > > > + - enum: > > > > > > This isn't correct as you are only defining possible names for the > > > first item. Drop the '-' (making items a schema instead of a list) and > > > then it applies to all. However, doing that will cause a meta-schema > > > error which I need to fix to allow. Or if there's a small set of > > > possibilities of number of inputs, you can list them under a 'oneOf' > > > list. > > > > Mhmm, I cannot test it or I have an error in the schema. if I > > understand correctly, this would be: > > > > clock-names: > > description: > > List of clock names for particular CLKOUT mux inputs > > minItems: 1 > > maxItems: 16 > > items: > > clkout0 > > clkout1 > > clkout2 > > clkout3 > > clkout4 > > clkout5 > > clkout6 > > clkout7 > > clkout8 > > clkout9 > > clkout10 > > clkout11 > > clkout12 > > clkout13 > > clkout14 > > clkout15 > > clkout16 > > > > Now it produces the error "ignoring, error in schema 'items'" but > > maybe it is expected with current meta-schema? > > 'make dt_binding_check' will give more detailed errors. > > Are the inputs always contiguous 0-N? If so, you want: > > items: > - const: clkout0 > - const: clkout1 > - const: clkout2 > ... > > If you want to express any number and order of strings is valid, then you need: > > items: > enum: > - clkout0 > - clkout1 > - clkout2 > > Doing that is discouraged for bindings though. Currently, it will > generate an error from the meta-schema, but we could change that. It's the second case. The inputs are not contiguous. Examples: system-controller { compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-pmu", "syscon"; clock-names = "clkout8"; clocks = <&cmu CLK_FIN_PLL>; } system-controller { compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu", "syscon"; clock-names = "clkout0", "clkout1", "clkout2", "clkout3", "clkout4", "clkout8", "clkout9"; clocks = <&clock CLK_OUT_DMC>, <&clock CLK_OUT_TOP>, <&clock CLK_OUT_LEFTBUS>, <&clock CLK_OUT_RIGHTBUS>, <&clock CLK_OUT_CPU>, <&clock CLK_XXTI>, <&clock CLK_XUSBXTI>; } The bindings never required any specific ordering. Also the driver just go through all indices and parses them. Your second syntax fails: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.yaml: properties:clock-names:items: {'enum': ['clkout0', 'clkout1', 'clkout2', 'clkout3', 'clkout4', 'clkout5', 'clkout6', 'clkout7', 'clkout8', 'clkout9', 'clkout10', 'clkout11', 'clkout12', 'clkout13', 'clkout14', 'clkout15', 'clkout16']} is not of type 'array' Best regards, Krzysztof