Hi Rob,
On 30/08/2019 8.37, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On 30/08/2019 1.47, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:56:17PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> Similarly to paRAM slots, channels can be used by other cores.
>>>
>>> Add optional property to configure the reserved channel ranges.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
>>> index 4bbc94d829c8..1198682ada99 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ Optional properties:
>>> - ti,edma-reserved-slot-ranges: PaRAM slot ranges which should not be used by
>>> the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the
>>> DSP. See example.
>>> +- ti,edma-reserved-chan-ranges: channel ranges which should not be used by
>>> + the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the
>>> + DSP. See example.
>>
>> Based on the other thread, I think extending dma-channel-mask to a
>> uint32-array makes sense here.
>
> Yes, that is the reason I have asked on that and I'm in progress of
> converting the edma driver to use the dma-channel-mask.
> Just need to do some shuffling in the driver to get the mask in a form
> usable by the driver.
>
> I'll send an updated series early next week.
How should the dma-channel-mask uint31-array should be documented and used?
Basically some EDMA have 32, some 64 channels. This is fine.
Let's say I want to mask out channel 0-4 and 24-27
This would look like in case of EDMA with 32 channels:
&edma {
/* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
dma-channel-mask = <0xf0fffff0>;
};
How this should look like in case when I have 64 channels?
&edma {
/* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
dma-channel-mask = <0xf0fffff0>, <0xffffffff>;
};
When I read the u32s then
chan_mask[0] is for channel 0-31 (LSB is channel 0)
chan_maks[1] is for channel 32-63 (LSB is channel 32)
Or:
&edma {
/* channel 0-4 and 24-27 is not to be used */
dma-channel-mask = <0xffffffff>, <0xf0fffff0>;
};
chan_maks[0] is for channel 32-63 (LSB is channel 32)
chan_mask[1] is for channel 0-31 (LSB is channel 0)
Do you have pointer on already established notion on how to document and
handle this?
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
