On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used
> for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - No change.
> v3:
> - No change.
>
> drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> index 6e208a0..d531951 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) },
The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that don't
have a define for their device ID. I think a define should be created
for both of the device IDs above.
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
> { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654),
> .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data
> --
> 2.9.5
>
