Hi Ray, > > With all the limitations in place, I wonder if it might be easier to > > implement an smbus_xfer callback instead? What is left that makes this > > controller more than SMBus and real I2C? > > > > Right. But what is the implication of using smbus_xfer instead of > master_xfer in our driver? > > Does it mean it will break existing functions of the i2c app that our > customers developed based on i2cdev (e.g., I2C_RDWR)? If the customers uses I2C_RDWR (and it cannot be mapped to i2c_smbus_* calls) then this is an indication that there is some I2C functionality left which the HW can provide. I'd be interested which one, though. > > 1) Does Maybe you wanted to describe it here and it got accidently cut off? Regards, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
