Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Clarify interrupts-extended usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:55:11 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Reading the description about when to use interrupts-extended leads some
> developers to think that it shouldn't be used unless a device has
> interrupts from more than one interrupt controller. This isn't true. We
> should encourage devicetree writers to use this property in situations
> where it isn't the inherited interrupt-parent so that we have less
> properties in a DT node by virtue of not having to specify an
> interrupt-parent and an interrupts property.
> 
> Reported-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt          | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux