On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 04/21/2014 05:58 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
>> <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Retrieve DMA configuration from DT and setup platform device's DMA
>>> parameters. The DMA configuration in DT has to be specified using
>>> "dma-ranges" and "dma-coherent" properties if supported.
>>>
>>> We setup dma_pfn_offset using "dma-ranges" and dma_coherent_ops
>>> using "dma-coherent" device tree properties.
>>>
>>> The set_arch_dma_coherent_ops macro has to be defined by arch if
>>> it supports coherent dma_ops. Otherwise, set_arch_dma_coherent_ops() is
>>> declared as nop.
[...]
>>>
>>> + ret = of_dma_get_range(dev->of_node, &dma_addr, &paddr, &size);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>
>> Perhaps an error is not the right return for the default case. The
>> default should probably be dma_addr and paddr equal to 0 and size 4GB.
>
> The error code is needed here to properly distinguish the case when
> there are no "dma-ranges" defined in DT. Also, I think, that
> of_dma_get_range() shouldn't return any default values - It just
> has to get data from DT. And the caller should decide what to do
> with this data and how to handle error cases.
>
> So, I prefer to keep behavior as is:
> - in case of failure of_dma_get_range() will not touch values of
> &dma_addr, &paddr, &size.
Fine, but that is not how of_dma_get_range currently behaves:
+ *dma_addr = of_read_number(ranges, naddr);
+ *paddr = of_translate_dma_address(np, ranges);
+ if (*paddr == OF_BAD_ADDR) {
+ pr_err("%s: translation of DMA address(%pad) to CPU
address failed node(%s)\n",
+ __func__, dma_addr, np->full_name);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
