On 19-08-19, 10:56, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-19 10:43:31)
> > On 14-08-19, 10:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > > > index c0a678b0f159..846197bd65cd 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > > // Copyright (c) 2017-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> > > > // Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
> > > >
> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> > > > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > > > #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > > >
> > > > @@ -11,6 +12,59 @@
> > > > reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
> > > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +
> > > > + pon@800 {
> > >
> > > Maybe pon node name should be 'key' or 'power-on'?
> >
> > pon stands for power on device. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/qcom,pon.txt
>
> Right. I was hoping for a more standard node name vs. an acronym that's
> SoC specific.
Sure that sounds better to me, I will make it "power-on"
--
~Vinod
