On 19/08/2019 21:13, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 03:45:40PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 19/08/2019 15:30, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 01:24:11PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21:50AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>> On 12/08/2019 11:16, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:59:51AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>>>> On 22/07/2019 10:12, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>>>>>>> Newer Allwinner SoCs have different number of interrupts, let's add >>>>>>>> different compatibles for all of them to deal with this properly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you merge this through your tree (along with the bindings)? I'll >>>>>> merge the DT patches >>>>> >>>>> patches 1-4 then ? >>>> >>>> Yep, thanks! >>> >>> Ping? >> >> They are applied :) > > Oh, my bad :) Actually, I should have tell you they were applied. > Where is your tree these days? I couldn't find it in linux-next either https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=clockevents/next -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
