Hi Rob,
On 15.08.19 15:43, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:55 AM Stefan Riedmüller
<s.riedmueller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 13.08.19 18:04, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:49:32AM +0200, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
Add devicetree bindings for i.MX6 UL/ULL based phyCORE-i.MX6 UL/ULL and
phyBOARD-Segin.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
index 7294ac36f4c0..40f007859092 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
@@ -161,12 +161,20 @@ properties:
items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx6ul-14x14-evk # i.MX6 UltraLite 14x14 EVK Board
+ - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10 # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin with i.MX6 UL
+ - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10-emmc # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin eMMC Kit
+ - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10-nand # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin NAND Kit
+ - phytec,imx6ul-pcl063 # PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX 6UL
This doesn't match what is in the dts files:
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-pcl063.dtsi: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063", "fsl,imx6ul";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin-full.dts: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10", "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063",
"fsl,imx6ul";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin.dtsi: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pbacd-10", "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063",
"fsl,imx6ul";
Shawn already applied my patches which rename the compatibles, see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/23/42
In any case, it still doesn't match. For example, from those patches:
+ model = "PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin i.MX6 ULL Full Featured with eMMC";
+ compatible = "phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10-emmc", "phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10",
+ "phytec,imx6ull-pcl063","fsl,imx6ull";
The correct schema for this would be:
items:
- const: phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10-emmc
- const: phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10
- const: phytec,imx6ull-pcl063
- const: fsl,imx6ull
This defines how many entries (4), what they are, and the order of
them. Maybe the first entry can be an enum with the -nand compatible
if those are 2 options.
Run 'make dtbs_check' and make sure there aren't warnings for the root node.
Thanks for your input. I will take another closer look at this and send a
new version.
Stefan
Rob
