Re: [RFC 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Document 'location' property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sakari,

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:56:35AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:28:11PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Add the 'location' device property, used to specify the camera device
> > mounting position. The property is particularly meaningful for mobile
> > devices with a well defined usage orientation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > index f884ada0bffc..819077b2649c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
> > @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ Optional properties
> >    but a number of degrees counter clockwise. Typical values are 0 and 180
> >    (upside down).
> >
> > +- location: The camera device mounting position, relative to the device
> > +  usage orientation. Possible values are:
> > +  0 - Front camera. The image sensor is mounted on the front side of the device.
> > +  1 - Back camera. The image sensor is mounted on the back side of the device.
>
> Would it make sense to make this a little more generic? Such as s/image
> sensor/ device/, for instance?

Laurent seems to be of the opposite opinion, but i think staying as
generic as possible might be a good idea. Now I have a linguistic
problem though.

 +- location: The device mounting position, relative to the device
 +  usage orientation. Possible values are:
 +  0 - Front. The device is mounted on the front side of the device.
 +  1 - Back. The device is mounted on the back side of the device.

So I need one "device" to indicate the lens/flash/image sensor and one
to indicate the device they're installed on :) Any idea?

>
> Is this also relevant for flash or lens devices?
>
> Flash (torch) devices could be present, at least principle, without a
> camera. There once was even such a Nokia phone, 1100 unless I'm mistaken.
> :-)

Not to mention that lenses are indeed installed in the same package as
the camera sensor, but they're described as separate device nodes as
flash leds are, so the mounting location might need to be specified in their
device node properties too, even if it would be the same as the image
sensor one.

>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux