Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Drop PMU node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vasily Khoruzhick writes:
> OK, so what should we do? 'perf top'/'perf record' work fine if PMU
> node is dropped, but they don't work if PMU node is present (even with
> interrupts dropped).

Really? Even if you tell it to only listen to software events? (Which
is the only thing you get without a PMU anyway, I believe.)

> I'd prefer to have 'perf top' and 'perf record'
> working instead of 'perf stat'

I think, if a broken PMU confuses 'perf top' beyond usability, it
should be fixed.

Harald

-- 
Nationalratswahl: Ich trete als unabhängiger Experte für Klimaschutz
und freie Software an! Ich will mit Vorzugsstimmen ins Parlament kommen,
weil wenn ich es nicht mache, kümmert sich womöglich niemand darum.
https://haraldgeyer.at



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux