On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:53:55PM +0100, Joe Burmeister wrote:
> +static void _eeprom_at25_store_erase_locked(struct at25_data *at25)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout, retries;
> + int sr, status;
> + u8 cp;
> +
> + cp = AT25_WREN;
> + status = spi_write(at25->spi, &cp, 1);
> + if (status < 0) {
> + dev_dbg(&at25->spi->dev, "ERASE WREN --> %d\n", status);
> + return;
> + }
> + cp = at25->erase_instr;
> + status = spi_write(at25->spi, &cp, 1);
> + if (status < 0) {
> + dev_dbg(&at25->spi->dev, "CHIP_ERASE --> %d\n", status);
> + return;
> + }
> + /* Wait for non-busy status */
> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ERASE_TIMEOUT);
> + retries = 0;
> + do {
> + sr = spi_w8r8(at25->spi, AT25_RDSR);
> + if (sr < 0 || (sr & AT25_SR_nRDY)) {
> + dev_dbg(&at25->spi->dev,
> + "rdsr --> %d (%02x)\n", sr, sr);
> + /* at HZ=100, this is sloooow */
> + msleep(1);
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (!(sr & AT25_SR_nRDY))
> + return;
> + } while (retries++ < 200 || time_before_eq(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + if ((sr < 0) || (sr & AT25_SR_nRDY)) {
> + dev_err(&at25->spi->dev,
> + "chip erase, timeout after %u msecs\n",
> + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies -
> + (timeout - ERASE_TIMEOUT)));
> + status = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
No need for 2 lines :(
> +static ssize_t eeprom_at25_store_erase(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct at25_data *at25 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int erase = 0;
> +
> + sscanf(buf, "%d", &erase);
> + if (erase) {
> + mutex_lock(&at25->lock);
> + _eeprom_at25_store_erase_locked(at25);
> + mutex_unlock(&at25->lock);
> + }
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(erase, S_IWUSR, NULL, eeprom_at25_store_erase);
> +
> +
Same here.
Also, where is the Documentation/ABI/ update for the new sysfs file?
> static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct at25_data *at25 = NULL;
> @@ -311,6 +379,7 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> int err;
> int sr;
> int addrlen;
> + int has_erase;
>
> /* Chip description */
> if (!spi->dev.platform_data) {
> @@ -352,6 +421,9 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> spi_set_drvdata(spi, at25);
> at25->addrlen = addrlen;
>
> + /* Optional chip erase instruction */
> + device_property_read_u8(&spi->dev, "chip_erase_instruction", &at25->erase_instr);
> +
> at25->nvmem_config.name = dev_name(&spi->dev);
> at25->nvmem_config.dev = &spi->dev;
> at25->nvmem_config.read_only = chip.flags & EE_READONLY;
> @@ -370,17 +442,22 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (IS_ERR(at25->nvmem))
> return PTR_ERR(at25->nvmem);
>
> - dev_info(&spi->dev, "%d %s %s eeprom%s, pagesize %u\n",
> + has_erase = (!(chip.flags & EE_READONLY) && at25->erase_instr);
> +
> + dev_info(&spi->dev, "%d %s %s eeprom%s, pagesize %u%s\n",
> (chip.byte_len < 1024) ? chip.byte_len : (chip.byte_len / 1024),
> (chip.byte_len < 1024) ? "Byte" : "KByte",
> at25->chip.name,
> (chip.flags & EE_READONLY) ? " (readonly)" : "",
> - at25->chip.page_size);
> + at25->chip.page_size, (has_erase)?" <has erase>":"");
> +
> + if (has_erase && device_create_file(&spi->dev, &dev_attr_erase))
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "can't create erase interface\n");
You just raced with userspace and lost :(
Please create an attribute group and add it to the .dev_groups pointer
in struct driver so it can be created properly in a race-free manner.
See the thread at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190731124349.4474-2-gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
for the details on how to do that.
thanks,
greg k-h
