On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:03 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:17 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> > <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Some SoCs might have multiple interconnects each with their own DMA
> > > addressing limitations. This function parses the 'dma-ranges' on each of
> > > them and tries to guess the maximum SoC wide DMA addressable memory
> > > size.
> > >
> > > This is specially useful for arch code in order to properly setup CMA
> > > and memory zones.
> >
> > We already have a way to setup CMA in reserved-memory, so why is this
> > needed for that?
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but I got the feeling you got the point of the patch
> later on.
No, for CMA I don't. Can't we already pass a size and location for CMA
region under /reserved-memory. The only advantage here is perhaps the
CMA range could be anywhere in the DMA zone vs. a fixed location.
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/of/fdt.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/of_fdt.h | 2 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > index 9cdf14b9aaab..f2444c61a136 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > @@ -953,6 +953,78 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_stdout(void)
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * early_init_dt_dma_zone_size - Look at all 'dma-ranges' and provide the
> > > + * maximum common dmable memory size.
> > > + *
> > > + * Some devices might have multiple interconnects each with their own DMA
> > > + * addressing limitations. For example the Raspberry Pi 4 has the
> > > following:
> > > + *
> > > + * soc {
> > > + * dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x3c000000>;
> > > + * [...]
> > > + * }
> > > + *
> > > + * v3dbus {
> > > + * dma-ranges = <0x00000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x3c000000>;
> > > + * [...]
> > > + * }
> > > + *
> > > + * scb {
> > > + * dma-ranges = <0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x00000000 0xfc000000>;
> > > + * [...]
> > > + * }
> > > + *
> > > + * Here the area addressable by all devices is [0x00000000-0x3bffffff].
> > > Hence
> > > + * the function will write in 'data' a size of 0x3c000000.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note that the implementation assumes all interconnects have the same
> > > physical
> > > + * memory view and that the mapping always start at the beginning of RAM.
> >
> > Not really a valid assumption for general code.
>
> Fair enough. On my defence I settled on that assumption after grepping all dts
> and being unable to find a board that behaved otherwise.
>
> [...]
>
> > It's possible to have multiple levels of nodes and dma-ranges. You need to
> > handle that case too. Doing that and handling differing address translations
> > will be complicated.
>
> Understood.
>
> > IMO, I'd just do:
> >
> > if (of_fdt_machine_is_compatible(blob, "brcm,bcm2711"))
> > dma_zone_size = XX;
> >
> > 2 lines of code is much easier to maintain than 10s of incomplete code
> > and is clearer who needs this. Maybe if we have dozens of SoCs with
> > this problem we should start parsing dma-ranges.
>
> FYI that's what arm32 is doing at the moment and was my first instinct. But it
> seems that arm64 has been able to survive so far without any machine specific
> code and I have the feeling Catalin and Will will not be happy about this
> solution. Am I wrong?
No doubt. I'm fine if the 2 lines live in drivers/of/.
Note that I'm trying to reduce the number of early_init_dt_scan_*
calls from arch code into the DT code so there's more commonality
across architectures in the early DT scans. So ideally, this can all
be handled under early_init_dt_scan() call.
Rob
