On 29/07/2019 19:41:49+0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Josef Friedl <josef.friedl@xxxxxxxx>
>
> use mt6397 rtc driver also for mt6323
> compatible needed because of different rtc-base/size see part 7
I still don't think this is a good reason so I would remove that
sentence. Also, it refers to part 7 which is an info that will not be
available when looking at the git history.
>
> changes since v2: splitted this from v2.3 suggested-by Alexandre Belloni
>
Changelog after the --- marker please.
> Signed-off-by: Josef Friedl <josef.friedl@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> index 9370b7fc9f81..21cd9cc8b4c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_rtc_suspend,
> mt6397_rtc_resume);
>
> static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc", },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", },
> { }
> };
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
