On Thu 01 Aug 03:07 PDT 2019, Rajendra Nayak wrote: [..] > +static const struct msm_pingroup sc7180_groups[] = { > + [0] = PINGROUP(0, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _), > + [1] = PINGROUP(1, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _), > + [2] = PINGROUP(2, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _), > + [3] = PINGROUP(3, SOUTH, qup01, sp_cmu, dbg_out, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _), > + [4] = PINGROUP(4, NORTH, sdc1_tb, _, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _, _), [5] = PINGROUP(5, NORTH, sdc2_tb, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _), > + [6] = PINGROUP(6, NORTH, qup11, qup11, _, _, _, _, _, _, _), [7] = PINGROUP(7, NORTH, qup11, qup11, ddr_bist, _, _, _, _, _, _), 5 and 7 deserve to be on their own line :) Apart from that: Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Bjorn