Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied > > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts. > > > > > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine. > > > > > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference. > > > > > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not > > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream. > > > All but 5/6 applied, thanks. > > Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :( It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased on the top of docs-next. > There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved > to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get > moved in the end? Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions is that we didn't reach a conclusion. In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you can do it directly, if you prefer so). Thanks, Mauro
