On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:09:37PM +0100, Thomas Preston wrote: > Add a debugfs device node which initiates the turn-on diagnostic routine > feature of the TDA7802 amplifier. The four status registers (one per > channel) are returned. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v1: > - Rename speaker-test to (turn-on) diagnostics > - Move turn-on diagnostic to debugfs as there is no standard ALSA > interface for this kind of routine. > > sound/soc/codecs/tda7802.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 185 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > +static int tda7802_bulk_update(struct regmap *map, struct reg_update *update, > + size_t update_count) > +{ > + int i, err; > + > + for (i = 0; i < update_count; i++) { > + err = regmap_update_bits(map, update[i].reg, update[i].mask, > + update[i].val); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + } > + > + return i; > +} This could probably be removed using regmap_multi_reg_write. > +static int tda7802_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) > +{ > + struct tda7802_priv *tda7802 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); > + struct device *dev = &tda7802->i2c->dev; > + int err; > + > + tda7802->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dev), NULL); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tda7802->debugfs)) { > + dev_info(dev, > + "Failed to create debugfs node, err %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(tda7802->debugfs)); > + return 0; > + } > + > + mutex_init(&tda7802->diagnostic_mutex); > + err = debugfs_create_file("diagnostic", 0444, tda7802->debugfs, tda7802, > + &tda7802_diagnostic_fops); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, > + "debugfs: Failed to create diagnostic node, err %d\n", > + err); > + goto cleanup_diagnostic; > + } You shouldn't be failing the driver probe if debugfs fails, it should be purely optional. Thanks, Charles