Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] irqchip: Ingenic: Change interrupt handling form cascade to chained_irq.

[Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Zhou,



Le dim. 28 juil. 2019 à 13:34, Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxx> a 
écrit :
> The interrupt handling method is changed from old-style cascade to
> chained_irq which is more appropriate. Also, it can process the
> corner situation that more than one irq is coming to a single
> chip at the same time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c | 37 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
> index f126255..49f7685 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>  /*
>   *  Copyright (C) 2009-2010, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> - *  JZ4740 platform IRQ support
> + *  Ingenic XBurst platform IRQ support
>   */
>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/ingenic.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> @@ -32,22 +33,34 @@ struct ingenic_intc_data {
>  #define JZ_REG_INTC_PENDING	0x10
>  #define CHIP_SIZE		0x20
>
> -static irqreturn_t intc_cascade(int irq, void *data)
> +static void ingenic_chained_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> -	struct ingenic_intc_data *intc = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> -	uint32_t irq_reg;
> +	struct ingenic_intc_data *intc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	bool have_irq = false;
> +	uint32_t pending;
>  	unsigned i;
>
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>  	for (i = 0; i < intc->num_chips; i++) {
> -		irq_reg = readl(intc->base + (i * CHIP_SIZE) +
> +		pending = readl(intc->base + (i * CHIP_SIZE) +
>  				JZ_REG_INTC_PENDING);
> -		if (!irq_reg)
> +		if (!pending)
>  			continue;
>
> -		generic_handle_irq(__fls(irq_reg) + (i * 32) + JZ4740_IRQ_BASE);
> +		have_irq = true;
> +		while (pending) {
> +			int bit = __fls(pending);

Use the for_each_set_bit() macro here, that will be simpler.


> +
> +			generic_handle_irq(bit + (i * 32) + JZ4740_IRQ_BASE);
> +			pending &= ~BIT(bit);
> +		}
>  	}
>
> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	if (!have_irq)
> +		spurious_interrupt();
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
>
>  static void intc_irq_set_mask(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, uint32_t 
> mask)
> @@ -70,11 +83,6 @@ void ingenic_intc_irq_resume(struct irq_data *data)
>  	intc_irq_set_mask(gc, gc->mask_cache);
>  }
>
> -static struct irqaction intc_cascade_action = {
> -	.handler = intc_cascade,
> -	.name = "SoC intc cascade interrupt",
> -};
> -
>  static int __init ingenic_intc_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>  				       unsigned num_chips)
>  {
> @@ -139,7 +147,8 @@ static int __init ingenic_intc_of_init(struct 
> device_node *node,
>  	if (!domain)
>  		pr_warn("unable to register IRQ domain\n");
>
> -	setup_irq(parent_irq, &intc_cascade_action);
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(parent_irq,
> +					ingenic_chained_handle_irq, intc);
>  	return 0;
>
>  out_unmap_irq:
> --
> 2.7.4