Hi, Daniel > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > Your explanation makes a lot of sense. We will take care today of > > > > Abel's patch. > > > > What do you think about Fabio's patch? I also think this is a valid patch: > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Hmm, when did Fabio sent out this patch? I can NOT find it... > > > I also have a patch in this series (#4/6) doing same thing on July 5th... > > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpa > > > > tchwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F11032783%2F&data=02%7C01%7Canso > n.hu > > > > ang%40nxp.com%7C048d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2 > b4c6fa > > > > 92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636999816880118674&sdata=1HIMQ0l > iKpEFS > > > 6P2WSG%2FH9evspxIdxAvFmaklH1woDk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > He didn't send the patch yet. It was just a request for test here: > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcode. > > bulix.org%2Fpd88jp- > 812381&data=02%7C01%7Canson.huang%40nxp.com%7C0 > > > 48d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163 > 5%7C0 > > %7C0%7C636999816880118674&sdata=p70mgCDucCgLJ8TTRMn3a%2 > Fk68FXGQeiR > > FR0fVSV7Jlo%3D&reserved=0 > > > > But, now I see is exactly like your patch here: > > ... pressed send to early. > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.o > rg%2Flkml%2F2019%2F7%2F5%2F19&data=02%7C01%7Canson.huang% > 40nxp.com%7C048d8695b3dc4ceef6bd08d713f55e8a%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f > a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636999816880118674&sdata=ciWj8y > WPvkIZ5ni%2BohZuaqAXf9Pb2FCWhp9GQhpMwAY%3D&reserved=0 > > We are all set then. Thanks Anson for clarifications! Thanks, so we are all clear about this issue, need to wait thermal maintainer to review the rest patch in this series, but I did NOT receive any response from thermal sub-system maintainer for really long time, NOT sure when the thermal patches can be accepted. Anson
