Hi,
On 19. 7. 26. 오전 12:15, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25.07.2019 16:53, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> 2019년 7월 25일 (목) 오후 11:19, Kamil Konieczny
>> <k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>>>
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> On 25.07.2019 12:17, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> Hi Kamil,
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me. But, I have some comment. Please check them.
>>>
>>> Thank you for review, please see answers below.
>>>
>>>> After this patch, exynos_bus_target is perfectly same with
>>>> exynos_bus_passive_target. The exynos_bus_passive_target() could be removed.
>>>
>>> Ok, I will make it in separate patch to simplify review process.
>>
>> I think you can just modify this patch without any separate patch.
>
> Do you want me to send v5 with patch 5 squashed in patch 3 ?
Yes. In result, it made two functions same by this patch
So, I think that can combine them without separate patch.
>
>>>> On 19. 7. 20. 오전 12:05, k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> Reuse opp core code for setting bus clock and voltage. As a side
>>>>> effect this allow useage of coupled regulators feature (required
>>>>
>>>> s/useage/usage ?
>>>
>>> Good catch, I will change it.
>>>
>>>>> for boards using Exynos5422/5800 SoCs) because dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
>>>>> uses regulator_set_voltage_triplet() for setting regulator voltage
>>>>> while the old code used regulator_set_voltage_tol() with fixed
>>>>> tolerance. This patch also removes no longer needed parsing of DT
>>>>> property "exynos,voltage-tolerance" (no Exynos devfreq DT node uses
>>>>> it).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 143 +++++++++--------------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>>>> index f391044aa39d..c2147b0912a0 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>>>>> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
>>>>> -#define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE 2
>>>>>
>>>>> struct exynos_bus {
>>>>> struct device *dev;
>>>>> @@ -37,9 +36,9 @@ struct exynos_bus {
>>>>>
>>>>> unsigned long curr_freq;
>>>>>
>>>>> - struct regulator *regulator;
>>>>> + struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>>>> +
>>>>> struct clk *clk;
>>>>> - unsigned int voltage_tolerance;
>>>>> unsigned int ratio;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -99,56 +98,23 @@ static int exynos_bus_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq, u32 flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>>> struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
>>>>> - unsigned long old_freq, new_freq, new_volt, tol;
>>>>> int ret = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
>>>>> + /* Get correct frequency for bus. */
>>>>> new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
>>>>> if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
>>>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
>>>>> return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
>>>>> - new_volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(new_opp);
>>>>> dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
>>>>>
>>>>> - old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (old_freq == new_freq)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> - tol = new_volt * bus->voltage_tolerance / 100;
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* Change voltage and frequency according to new OPP level */
>>>>> mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, *freq);
>>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>>> + bus->curr_freq = *freq;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (old_freq < new_freq) {
>>>>> - ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to change clock of bus\n");
>>>>> - clk_set_rate(bus->clk, old_freq);
>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (old_freq > new_freq) {
>>>>> - ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(bus->regulator, new_volt, tol);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to set voltage\n");
>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
>>>>> - old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
>>>>> -out:
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> @@ -195,8 +161,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>>>>> dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
>>>>>
>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>>>>> - if (bus->regulator)
>>>>> - regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
>>>>> + if (bus->opp_table)
>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>>>>
>>>>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -209,39 +175,23 @@ static int exynos_bus_passive_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct exynos_bus *bus = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>>> struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp;
>>>>> - unsigned long old_freq, new_freq;
>>>>> - int ret = 0;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
>>>>> + /* Get correct frequency for bus. */
>>>>> new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
>>>>> if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
>>>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to get recommended opp instance\n");
>>>>> return PTR_ERR(new_opp);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - new_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(new_opp);
>>>>> dev_pm_opp_put(new_opp);
>>>>>
>>>>> - old_freq = bus->curr_freq;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (old_freq == new_freq)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* Change the frequency according to new OPP level */
>>>>> mutex_lock(&bus->lock);
>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, *freq);
>>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>>> + bus->curr_freq = *freq;
>>>>>
>>>>> - ret = clk_set_rate(bus->clk, new_freq);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to set the clock of bus\n");
>>>>> - goto out;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - *freq = new_freq;
>>>>> - bus->curr_freq = new_freq;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "Set the frequency of bus (%luHz -> %luHz, %luHz)\n",
>>>>> - old_freq, new_freq, clk_get_rate(bus->clk));
>>>>> -out:
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&bus->lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> @@ -259,20 +209,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> struct exynos_bus *bus)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct device *dev = bus->dev;
>>>>> - int i, ret, count, size;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* Get the regulator to provide each bus with the power */
>>>>> - bus->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(bus->regulator)) {
>>>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get VDD regulator\n");
>>>>> - return PTR_ERR(bus->regulator);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - ret = regulator_enable(bus->regulator);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to enable VDD regulator\n");
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + struct opp_table *opp_table;
>>>>> + const char *vdd = "vdd";
>>>>> + int i, count, size;
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Get the devfreq-event devices to get the current utilization of
>>>>> @@ -281,26 +220,29 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> count = devfreq_event_get_edev_count(dev);
>>>>> if (count < 0) {
>>>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to get the count of devfreq-event dev\n");
>>>>> - ret = count;
>>>>> - goto err_regulator;
>>>>> + return count;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - bus->edev_count = count;
>>>>>
>>>>> + bus->edev_count = count;
>>>>> size = sizeof(*bus->edev) * count;
>>>>> bus->edev = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> - if (!bus->edev) {
>>>>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> - goto err_regulator;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + if (!bus->edev)
>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>
>>>>> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>>>> bus->edev[i] = devfreq_event_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, i);
>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(bus->edev[i])) {
>>>>> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>>> - goto err_regulator;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(bus->edev[i]))
>>>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &vdd, 1);
>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
>>>>> + i = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set regulators %d\n", i);
>>>>> + return i;
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, you just used the 'i' defined variable instead of adding
>>>> new variable. But, I think that you better to add new variable
>>>> like 'err' for the readability. Or, jut use the 'PTR_ERR(opp_table)'
>>>> directly without any additional variable.
>>>
>>> I will remove not related changes, so here I will reuse 'ret' variable.
>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + bus->opp_table = opp_table;
>>>>
>>>> Add blank line.
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Optionally, Get the saturation ratio according to Exynos SoC
>>>>> * When measuring the utilization of each AXI bus with devfreq-event
>>>>> @@ -314,16 +256,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
>>>>> if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,saturation-ratio", &bus->ratio))
>>>>> bus->ratio = DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "exynos,voltage-tolerance",
>>>>> - &bus->voltage_tolerance))
>>>>> - bus->voltage_tolerance = DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE;
>>>>> -
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> -err_regulator:
>>>>> - regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct exynos_bus *bus)
>>>>> @@ -414,12 +347,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Parse the device-tree to get the resource information */
>>>>> ret = exynos_bus_parse_of(bus);
>>>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> - if (!passive)
>>>>> - regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>>> + goto err_reg;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (passive)
>>>>> goto passive;
>>>>> @@ -512,10 +441,12 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>
>>>>> err:
>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>>>>> - if (!passive)
>>>>> - regulator_disable(bus->regulator);
>>>>> -
>>>>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>>>>
>>>> This function removes the 'opp_table'. But, the below code
>>>> uses the 'opp_table' variable by dev_pm_opp_put_regulators().
>>>>
>>>> To disable the regulator, you have to call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev)
>>>> after dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table).
>>>
>>> Regulators should be set before dev_pm_opp_add_table(), so exit sequence
>>> should be in reverse order,
>>>
>>> init order:
>>>
>>> exynos_bus_parent_parse_of()
>>> dev_pm_opp_set_regulators()
>>> exynos_bus_parse_of()
>>> clk_prepare_enable()
>>> dev_pm_opp_of_add_table()
>>>
>>> exit or error order:
>>>
>>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
>>> clk_disable_unprepare()
>>> if (bus->opp_table)
>>> dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>
>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() have to be called at the end of exit sequence
>> after disabling clock and put regulators. Because dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
>> frees the 'opp_table' pointer of device.
>>
>> clk_disable_unprepare()
>> if (bus->opp_table)
>> dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
>
> The table is reference counted so it will be freed after count go to zero.
You're right. I checked it with OPP code.
>
>>> I will send v4 soon.
>>>
>>>>> +err_reg:
>>>>> + if (bus->opp_table) {
>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>>>>> + bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
