Re: [PATCH V5 11/18] clk: tegra210: Add support for Tegra210 clocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



18.07.2019 4:15, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:

[snip]

>>> Please try to fix all missing dependencies and orderings.
>>
>> Peter,
>>
>> dfllCPU_OUT is the first one to go thru restore when
>> clk_restore_context traverses thru the list.
>>
>> dfllCPU_OUT has dependency on DFLL_ref and DFLL_SOC but this
>> dependency is unknown to clock-tree.
>>
>> We can add DFLL_REF and DFLL_SOC as parents to dfllCPU_OUT during
>> register so dfllCPU_OUT save/restore happens after their parents are
>> restored.
>>
>> But DFLL needs both of these to be restored before DFLLCPU_Out and as
>> DFLL_SOC restore always happens after the REF, thinking to add
>> DFLL_SOC as parent to dfllCPU_OUT so save/restore follows after their
>> dependencies.
>>
>> Please comment.
>>
> Did quick try and I see by adding dfll-soc as parent to dfllCPU_OUT, its
> in proper order after all its dependencies.
> 
> Can now add dfll save/restore to do dfll reinit during restore..
> 

If dfllCPU_OUT can work properly with dfll-soc being disabled, then this
kind of dependency isn't very correct and just papers over the real
problem, which is that there should be a way for CCF to specify multiple
dependencies for the clock or the reverse ordering should be used for
the restoring.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux