On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:00 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Matching on the 'cpus' node was a bad choice because the schema is > incorrectly applied to non-RiscV cpus nodes. As we now have a common cpus > schema which checks the general structure, it is also redundant to do so > in the Risc-V CPU schema. > > The downside is one could conceivably mix different architecture's cpu > nodes or have typos in the compatible string. The latter problem pretty > much exists for every schema. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 143 ++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) Paul, do you plan to apply this? I have several fixes to send to Linus if you want me to include this. Rob
