Hi Florian, On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:28:39AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 7/10/19 8:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 5:23 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Florian, > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 02:37:47PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> On 7/3/19 12:37 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > >>>> The LED behavior of some Realtek PHYs is configurable. Add the > >>>> property 'realtek,led-modes' to specify the configuration of the > >>>> LEDs. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> Changes in v2: > >>>> - patch added to the series > >>>> --- > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/realtek.txt | 9 +++++++++ > >>>> include/dt-bindings/net/realtek.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > >>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/net/realtek.h > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek.txt > >>>> index 71d386c78269..40b0d6f9ee21 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek.txt > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/realtek.txt > >>>> @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ Optional properties: > >>>> > >>>> SSC is only available on some Realtek PHYs (e.g. RTL8211E). > >>>> > >>>> +- realtek,led-modes: LED mode configuration. > >>>> + > >>>> + A 0..3 element vector, with each element configuring the operating > >>>> + mode of an LED. Omitted LEDs are turned off. Allowed values are > >>>> + defined in "include/dt-bindings/net/realtek.h". > >>> > >>> This should probably be made more general and we should define LED modes > >>> that makes sense regardless of the PHY device, introduce a set of > >>> generic functions for validating and then add new function pointer for > >>> setting the LED configuration to the PHY driver. This would allow to be > >>> more future proof where each PHY driver could expose standard LEDs class > >>> devices to user-space, and it would also allow facilities like: ethtool > >>> -p to plug into that. > >>> > >>> Right now, each driver invents its own way of configuring LEDs, that > >>> does not scale, and there is not really a good reason for that other > >>> than reviewing drivers in isolation and therefore making it harder to > >>> extract the commonality. Yes, I realize that since you are the latest > >>> person submitting something in that area, you are being selected :) > > > > I agree. > > > >> I see the merit of your proposal to come up with a generic mechanism > >> to configure Ethernet LEDs, however I can't justify spending much of > >> my work time on this. If it is deemed useful I'm happy to send another > >> version of the current patchset that addresses the reviewer's comments, > >> but if the implementation of a generic LED configuration interface is > >> a requirement I will have to abandon at least the LED configuration > >> part of this series. > > > > Can you at least define a common binding for this. Maybe that's just > > removing 'realtek'. While the kernel side can evolve to a common > > infrastructure, the DT bindings can't. > > That would be a great start, and that is actually what I had in mind > (should have been more specific), I was not going to have you Matthias > do the grand slam and convert all this LED configuration into the LEDs > class etc. that would not be fair. > > It seems to be that we can fairly easily agree on a common binding for > LED configuration, I would define something along those lines to be > flexible: > > phy-led-configuration = <LED_NUM_MASK LED_CFG_MASK>; > > where LED_NUM_MASK is one of: > > 0 -> link > 1 -> activity > 2 -> speed I don't understand this proposal completely. Is LED_NUM_MASK actually a mask/set (potentially containing multiple LEDs) or is it "one of" the LEDs? Are you suggesting to assign each LED a specific role (link, activity, speed)? Could you maybe post a specific example involving multiple LEDs? Thanks Matthias > that way you can define single/dual/triple LED configurations by > updating the bitmask. > > LED_CFG_MASK is one of: > > 0 -> LED_CFG_10 > 1 -> LED_CFG_100 > 2 -> LED_CFG_1000 > > (let's assume 1Gbps or less for now) > > or this can be combined in a single cell with a left shift. > > Andrew, Heiner, do you see that approach working correctly and scaling > appropriately?
