Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth, On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:59:05 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > Are we sure, we want to fixup quirks like this the way below? We already have an exactly identical quirk for the A0 I2C issue, in the same file, right above the quirk Ezequiel is adding here. So using the same strategy for both cases would be nice. > Alternatively, we can also keep some armada-375-z1.dtsi and one > for the board including it. For minor differences such as SoC stepping, I personally prefer to not have separate Device Trees. We already have many of them, for each variant of the various SOCs. If we add the different steppings, it's going to be even more complicated. Also, there will be a new iteration of the Armada 375 DB with an A0 chip, which does not have the Z1 bug. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
