On 09.07.2019 07:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-07-19, 16:11, k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add enable regulators to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() and disable
>> regulators to dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(). This prepares for
>> converting exynos-bus devfreq driver to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/opp/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
>> index 0e7703fe733f..947cac452854 100644
>> --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
>> @@ -1580,8 +1580,19 @@ struct opp_table *dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(struct device *dev,
>> if (ret)
>> goto free_regulators;
>>
>> + for (i = 0; i < opp_table->regulator_count; i++) {
>> + ret = regulator_enable(opp_table->regulators[i]);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto disable;
>> + }
>
> I am wondering on why is this really required as this isn't done for
> any other platform, probably because the regulators are enabled by
> bootloader and are always on.
It is not ABI break, it should work with existing DTBs
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
