Hi, Viresh > On 09-07-19, 15:10, Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> > > > > With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table in DT could > > be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs are available, based on > > the version of the hardware running on. That introduces restriction of > > using "opp-suspend" > > property to define the suspend OPP, as we are NOT sure if the OPP > > containing "opp-suspend" property is available for the hardware > > running on, and the of opp core does NOT allow multiple suspend OPPs > > defined in DT OPP table. > > > > To eliminate this restrition, make of opp core allow multiple suspend > > OPPs defined in DT, and pick the OPP with highest rate and with > > "opp-suspend" property present to be suspend OPP, it can speed up the > > suspend/resume process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/opp/of.c | 9 ++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Please update the DT bindings first. OK, will send a V2 containing DT binding changes. > > FWIW, all three patches look fine otherwise. Thank you! Anson.
