Hi Alexander,
thank you for the Review
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. Juli 2019 um 22:43 Uhr
> Von: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > - rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(rtc->dev);
> > - if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
> > - return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
> > + mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > + "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> >
>
> This change may lead to a crash and the allocation was intentionally
> placed before the irq request.
i got no crash till now, but i will try to move the allocation before irq-request
> > - ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL,
> > - mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> > - "mt6397-rtc", rtc);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
> > rtc->irq, ret);
> > @@ -287,6 +281,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> >
> > + rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> > +
> > rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &mtk_rtc_ops;
> > static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc", },
>
> Unrelated change, this is not an improvement and must be accompanied by
> a documentation change.
documentation is changed in 1/7 defining this compatible. i called it improvement because existing driver now supports another chip
regards Frank
